Strict Liability in California Auto Defect Cases

Posted By The McClellan Law Firm || Apr 3, 2014

The principle of strict liability is an important issue to discuss when it comes to automotive defects. In accordance with this standard of legal responsibility, an auto manufacturer, retailer or distributor may be held liable for injuries caused by a defective product regardless of specific fault or negligence.

To get a better understanding of this principle in action, let us first define strict liability in more detail. The basic definition of strict liability is legal accountability that does not depend on actual negligence or intent to harm. In other injury claims, a plaintiff (injured party) must prove negligence or wrongdoing of some kind on the part of the defendant (allegedly at-fault party) in order to recover financial compensation for injuries suffered. When strict liability applies, the plaintiff does not need to prove negligence or wrongdoing. The plaintiff must still prove that the defendant should be held liable, but the burden of proof will not depend on a specific act of negligence, inaction that constitutes negligence or intentional wrongdoing.

Strict liability in an auto defect claim may mean that a company may be held accountable for injuries a defective or poorly designed product may cause:

"A manufacturer, distributor, or retailer is liable in tort if a defect in the manufacture or design of its product causes injury while the product is being used in a reasonably foreseeable way." Soule v. GM Corp. 8 Cal.4th 548, 560 - 1994).

If a vehicle owner is using his or her vehicle in a "reasonably foreseeable way," that is, in such a way as a reasonable person would in similar circumstances, and yet a defect in the vehicle or vehicle part caused an accident or other incident that left the owner or another party injured, the plaintiff may be able to hold the manufacturer or other party responsible for the defect accountable.

There are three unique categories in which a strict liability claim may fall. The first involves manufacturing defects, in which a properly designed product is improperly manufactured and causes injury as a result. The second involves a poorly designed product that, although it may have been properly manufactured, is unsafe or malfunctions and causes injury. The third involves inadequate or improper warnings regarding the product, such as a failure to warn about using the product in certain circumstances, which could result in injury.

"Strict liability has been invoked for three types of defects – manufacturing defects, design defects, and 'warning defects,' i.e. inadequate warnings or failures to warn." Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 - 1991).

Vehicle owners, passengers and bystanders (such as pedestrians, bicyclists or occupants of other vehicles) may be able to bring product liability lawsuits against auto manufacturers, retailers or distributors involving vehicle defects:

"If anything, bystanders should be entitled to greater protection than the consumer or user where injury to bystanders from the defect is reasonably foreseeable." ( Elmore v. American Motors Corp. 70 Cal.2d 578, 586 - 1969).

Proof in an Auto Product Liability Claim

If negligence or intentional wrongdoing need not be proven in an auto product liability lawsuit, what factors does a plaintiff need to prove? Though every case is different, the following is a basic outline of the key factors that must be proven:

  • The product was defective;
  • The plaintiff was injured; and
  • The product's defect was the proximate cause of the victim's injuries.
If you would like to find out more about auto defect cases and the role a San Diego personal injury attorney can play in helping you seek justice even against a large manufacturer or dealership, now is the time to contact The McClellan Law Firm. Product liability is a primary focus of our firm, and we have been able to achieve outstanding results for our clients. Call today for a free case review .
Blog Home


  • “Your appearance on the nation-wide broadcast of ‘60 Minutes’ was a public service in which all San Diego has reason to take great pride. To integrity—you have added public service and again elevated my opinion of the legal profession.”

    - Juror

  • “We could not be happier with the McCllelan Law Firm team! My husband and I were referred to Craig McCllelan by one of his peers. We had a very sensitive medical malpractice case that we were hesitant to even pursue. Craig and his team sat down and walked us through the entire process giving us their honest opinion and options. We felt very comfortable with the process and completely relieved by the end of the first meeting, so we decided to proceed. It is three years later and we couldn't be happier that we did. Craig, Connor, and his team made the entire experience so easy and smooth. They were always available no matter how small our question or concern. I swear they work 24/7! And most importantly, we knew that they truly cared about us and the outcome. They fought for our family and have given us the piece of mind that our son's healthcare will always be covered. It is truly the greatest gift and we will forever be in their debt!”

    - S.P.

  • “I just wanted to thank you for your efforts on [Pam’s] behalf, your skills, and your heart. You are not just a lawyer in what you do, you are a master of your profession. And I hope you are passing your mastery to others who may stand in on behalf of the weak or the helpless. It is an honorable effort and a world of mercy. I saw the extreme and extended dedication you put forth yield the best possible results on [Pam’s] behalf.”

    - Juror

  • “We will NEVER forget what you did for us Craig. We are FOREVER GRATEFUL.”

    - K.V.

  • “We wouldn’t be here, in this moment of life without the kindness and professionalism of you all and how you went to bat for us! Eternally grateful!”

    - A.K.

View More

Our Awards & Accolades