Chrysler Jeep Recall: Company's Choice Could Be Disastrous

Posted By The McClellan Law Firm || Jun 14, 2013

Chrysler Refuses to Issue Recall

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recently requested that Chrysler Group LLC issue a recall of 2.7 million Jeep Grand Cherokees (model years 1993 to 2004) and Libertys (2002 to 2007). Chrysler's response? "The subject vehicles are safe and not defective."

Chrysler has refused to issue a recall on its potentially defective SUVs, claiming that "NHTSA's initial conclusions are based on an incomplete analysis of the underlying data."

According to the NHTSA, the vehicles can start on fire during rear-end collisions. Car fires involving the Grand Cherokee and Liberty models have killed more than 50 people. Upon learning of Chrysler's refusal to take action, NHTSA Administrator David Strickland said, "NHTSA hopes that Chrysler will reconsider its position and take action to protect its customers and the driving public."

Is Chrysler Putting Profit Above Public Safety?

The vehicles in question have gas tanks behind their rear axles. According to the NHTSA, Chrysler was aware that it was safer to place the gas tanks in front of the rear axles but refused to do so for these vehicles. Now, consumers who have the Jeeps in question will have to wait for Chrysler to agree to a recall or for the NHTSA to order a recall through court proceedings—if those steps ever take place. The last time an auto manufacturer refused to recall vehicles was two years ago, when Ford Motor Co. ignored an NHTSA request to recall its F-150 trucks for air bag defects. Ford eventually recalled the vehicles under significant government pressure.

Public Response to Recall Refusal

Chrysler now faces an uphill battle.

The negative publicity generated by such a move can cause significant damage to an automobile company. Take, for example, Chrysler's statement that its vehicles meet legal standards and are comparable to others sold at the same time. That statement was met with disgust by the NHTSA. "The existence of a minimum standard does not require NHTSA to ignore deadly problems," Strickland said.

According to a survey by Auto Trader, 34% of Americans lose some faith in an auto manufacturer every time a recall is announced. Yet, when a car company chooses to voluntarily recall a vehicle, 54% of people think more favorably of that company. These numbers indicate a preference for auto companies that "do the right thing."

The NHTSA's recall request is enough to make consumers nervous and lose faith in Chrysler, but the company's refusal to issue a recall can only make the situation worse. This is true even if Chrysler is right that the SUV fire incidents investigated by the NHTSA were high-energy collisions during which auto fires would have occurred regardless of the fuel tank design.

As one author explained to CNN:

"It's going to be this long drama that everyone watches. There will be testimony about children burning in fires. Even if the data is in [Chrysler's] favor, do you know many people who are statisticians?"

Chrysler has said it will refuse to issue a recall even if that means it must go to federal court over the issues. The company has until June 18 to reply to the NHTSA. After that date, the NHTSA may release a defect finding, gather public comments on the issue and then, depending on the facts, order a recall. If Chrysler continues to disagree about the recall, it can bring the NHTSA to federal court. Similarly, NHTSA can request the court to order Chrysler to recall the vehicles.

Categories: Auto Defects
Blog Home

Testimonials

  • “We do not quite know how to verbalize or show how grateful we are to have had the distinct honor to have you represent us at truly the most critical time in our lives.”

    - S.C.

  • “Your appearance on the nation-wide broadcast of ‘60 Minutes’ was a public service in which all San Diego has reason to take great pride. To integrity—you have added public service and again elevated my opinion of the legal profession.”

    - Juror

  • “We could not be happier with the McCllelan Law Firm team! My husband and I were referred to Craig McCllelan by one of his peers. We had a very sensitive medical malpractice case that we were hesitant to even pursue. Craig and his team sat down and walked us through the entire process giving us their honest opinion and options. We felt very comfortable with the process and completely relieved by the end of the first meeting, so we decided to proceed. It is three years later and we couldn't be happier that we did. Craig, Connor, and his team made the entire experience so easy and smooth. They were always available no matter how small our question or concern. I swear they work 24/7! And most importantly, we knew that they truly cared about us and the outcome. They fought for our family and have given us the piece of mind that our son's healthcare will always be covered. It is truly the greatest gift and we will forever be in their debt!”

    - S.P.

  • “It was a real honor to preside over a case with you as counsel. In my mind you represent all that is good in our profession.”

    - Judge J.

  • “I just wanted to thank you for your efforts on [Pam’s] behalf, your skills, and your heart. You are not just a lawyer in what you do, you are a master of your profession. And I hope you are passing your mastery to others who may stand in on behalf of the weak or the helpless. It is an honorable effort and a world of mercy. I saw the extreme and extended dedication you put forth yield the best possible results on [Pam’s] behalf.”

    - Juror

View More

Our Awards & Accolades